Skip to Content

Non-Invasive Fat Reduction: CoolSculpting, LPG & BodyFX Explained

How three different technologies tackle stubborn fat — and what science says about each

Non-invasive body contouring has come a long way. Today, multiple technologies can reduce stubborn fat deposits without surgery, needles, or significant downtime. But how do they actually work — and what can you realistically expect?

We offer three distinct body contouring technologies at ihohud, each with different strengths. Here's what the science says about each one.

CoolSculpting: Freezing Fat Away

CoolSculpting uses cryolipolysis — controlled cooling that exploits a simple biological fact: fat cells are more sensitive to cold than surrounding tissue. When cooled to approximately -11°C, fat cells undergo apoptosis (programmed cell death) while skin, nerves, and muscle remain unharmed.

Over 1-3 months, your body's macrophages naturally clear the dead fat cells. The process was first described by Manstein et al. in 2008 and has since been validated by extensive clinical research.

What the evidence shows: A systematic review of 19 studies found that CoolSculpting reduces the treated fat layer by 10-25% per session as measured by ultrasound. The treatment is FDA-cleared for 9 body areas including abdomen, flanks, thighs, and the double chin.

The PAH question: Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia (where the treated area grows instead of shrinking) has been reported. The largest independent study — 2,114 patients across 8 centers — found an incidence of 0.15% per treatment cycle. Newer device generations have reduced this rate by over 75%.

LPG Endermologie: Mechanical Tissue Stimulation

LPG Endermologie works differently — it uses motorized rollers and sequential suction to mechanically stimulate tissue. This mechanotransduction process activates fibroblasts, stimulates collagen and elastin production, improves lymphatic drainage, and mobilizes fat.

What the evidence shows: In a study of 118 patients, 99% showed measurable circumference reduction, averaging 2.9 cm per body site. It has the best safety profile of all three technologies — no serious adverse events in the literature.

Important distinction: LPG does not permanently destroy fat cells. It mobilizes fat, improves circulation, and enhances skin quality. Results require maintenance sessions. This makes it ideal for overall body conditioning, cellulite management, and post-surgical recovery.

BodyFX: Radiofrequency Meets Electrical Energy

BodyFX combines two types of energy simultaneously: bipolar radiofrequency that heats fat to therapeutic temperatures (41-43°C) for thermal lipolysis, and high-voltage electrical pulses that create irreversible damage to fat cell membranes. The dual mechanism also stimulates collagen contraction for skin tightening.

What the evidence shows: A prospective study of 20 patients demonstrated a 39.6% mean reduction in fat thickness at 3 months. The device's built-in temperature monitoring ensures safe thermal endpoints.

Honest Comparison

FeatureCoolSculptingLPG EndermologieBodyFX
Permanent fat destructionYesNoYes
Fat reduction per course10-25%Circumference only~40%
Skin tighteningNoYesYes
Sessions needed1-2 per area15+6-8
Maintenance requiredUsually noYesUsually no
Evidence baseStrongModerateLimited

Who Is a Good Candidate?

All three technologies work best for people with a BMI under 30 who have localized fat deposits resistant to diet and exercise. These are body contouring tools, not weight loss solutions. The ideal candidate has "pinchable" fat in specific areas and realistic expectations.

Learn more about our body contouring options: CoolSculpting, LPG Endermologie, and BodyFX.


Sources

  1. Manstein D et al. (2008). "Selective cryolysis." Lasers Surg Med. PMID: 18951424
  2. Ingargiola MJ et al. (2015). "Cryolipolysis: safety and efficacy." Plast Reconstr Surg. PMID: 26017594
  3. Nikolis A, Enright KM. (2021). "PAH following cryolipolysis: 8,658 cycles." Aesthet Surg J. PMID: 33216910
  4. Kutlubay Z et al. (2013). "LPG endermologie for cellulite." PMID: 23581834
  5. Duncan DI et al. (2016). "BodyFX prospective study." PMID: 26962636
  6. Kennedy J et al. (2023). "Non-invasive body contouring review." PMID: 37749418
Chemical Peels Compared: How to Choose the Right One for Your Skin
A research-backed guide to peel types, depths, and what science says about results